Skip to content
  • Home
  • My Story
  • Book Reviews
  • Contact Me

Marie at 1 Write Way

  • Blogging is fun!

    May 22nd, 2008

    My most favorite blogger, John Hewitt, has a delightful post about why he loves blogging more than freelancing. He gives five reasons: (1) he doesn’t have to send out query letters; (2) he can write about whatever he wants; (3) he doesn’t have to answer to an editor; (4) he can get published when he wants to be; and (5) he gets to connect with readers. Read his full post here or click on the RSS feed at the right-hand sidebar and keep up on his posts.

    For me, the freedom of blogging is a double-edged sword: it does free me to write whatever I want, but it also takes time away from working on my stories and novel. I have a day job which definitely limits the amount of time I have to write. I often feel guilty (in fact, I feel guilty right now) when I spend time working on a post that no one may read or comment on, time that I could be spending on revising a short story, editing my novel, or brainstorming another story idea.

    But I keep blogging because it is fun. Like John, I enjoy seeing my words published without having to go through gatekeepers. And it is still writing. No matter what, I am still writing.

    How do you all feel about blogging, if you have your own blog? What drives you to blog? What keeps you blogging? How many of you have day jobs that leave you with precious little time to write? How do you persevere?

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • The debate on self-publishing continues

    May 19th, 2008

    Georganna Hancock of A Writer’s Edge has an interesting post on what’s wrong with self-publishing. She makes some good points, noting that some self-published books lack quality in both writing and book design. Of course, I took exception to her general tone and just had to post a response. You can link to her post here. My response, in full:

    “You note that “a lack of professionalism in most aspects marks self-publishing efforts, and this is what traditional publishing usually brings to the effort.” Although you provide the caveat that traditional publishing does not always reflect the professionalism that one should expect from it, I think you do self-published authors a disservice by tossing them in the trash. The technology for print on demand books is improving every day and more writers are becoming savvy to the pros and cons of self-publishing. The Writing Show with Paula B. has interviewed a number of POD authors who enjoy at least a modest success, and websites that review POD books are sprouting up (see, for example, POD Books and More), providing some gatekeeping for the discriminating reader.
    Any author who wants to see her work in print and not be embarrassed by it should study closely the wealth of information on self-publishing in general and PODs in particular (for a start, she could visit my blog at http://www.1writeway.wordpress.com). At a minimum, she should retain an editor who can apply the necessary objective eye to her writing. Although chain bookstores usually refuse to place a POD book, small independent bookstores often fill that gap. With some effort (along with fortitude and an obsessive persistence), a self-published author might develop a fan base within her own community. It’s possible and it’s worth the effort of any writer who wants to see her writing in print but who has grown weary and disillusioned by the seemingly never-ending rejections from traditional gatekeepers. Should a dedicated writer never see her words in print just because traditional publishers shoo her away? What if John Irving had given up on The World According to Garp?
    What bothers me most about the argument against self-publishing is the assumption that the gatekeepers of traditional publishing know what’s best for readers. They will ensure that we have access to only the best (in their opinion) writing. Unfortunately, what I often see while I stroll through the aisles at my local Borders is the same old, lowest-common-denominator fodder, whether in fiction or non-fiction.
    Some of our greatest authors were self-published (Virginia Woolf, Walt Whitman, to name a couple). Would our traditional gatekeepers publish them today? What would American or English literature be like today if Walt Whitman or Virginia Woolf had not had the toughness of ego to publish their writing? For sure, Michael Cunningham would have had no subject for his novel, The Hours.
    But thank you for sharing your thoughts, Georganna. Self- vs. traditional publishing is an interesting debate and one that will likely go on for much longer.”

    Sigh, that’s enough ranting for today.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Feedback from Self-Published Authors

    May 18th, 2008

    This Sunday’s New York Times has a couple of interesting letters in the Book Review section, responding to Rachel Donadio’s essay of on POD publishing. Maryann McFadden and Daryl Pebbles (AKA Hutton Hayes) are published authors. Click here to read their letters in full. Ms. McFadden originally published her master’s thesis, a novel, as a POD. She describes herself as “one of those rare exceptions: my self-published novel, which began as my master’s thesis, sold enough copies to land a good agent who sold it at auction. My novel, “The Richest Season,” will be published by Hyperion in June.” Mr. Peebles, who writes under the pseudonym Hutton Hayes, describes self-published authors as “voices lost in the muddled middle who spend five years writing a novel and seek the same opportunity for survival as traditionally published authors. They may sell 200 books, or 200,000, or only one, but now they can, at least, be read.”

    Cheers to both Ms. McFadden and Mr. Peebles. They remind us that that money, although a nice side benefit, is often not the carrot that keeps us going; rather, it’s the love of the written word, the desire to be read and, thus, heard.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • More on POD–correction

    May 14th, 2008

    This just in from Mr. Orr regarding his website, POD Book Reviews & More:

    “As of 4/1/08, iUBR was opened up to submissions from most POD imprints. I could never have handled the volume alone, but five additional reviewers were added earlier this year. We welcome submissions from all POD brands except Lulu, which has its own legitimate, independent review site in Lulu Book Review. Thank you.”

    What good news for self-published authors!

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • More on POD

    May 14th, 2008

    Remember my rank about self-published authors needing book reviewers in order to gain legitimacy? Well, one such reviewer just contacted me! Floyd M. Orr , a self-published author himself, offers to read and review iUniverse publications at his website, POD Book Reviews & More. He doesn’t mince words when it comes to his preference for only iUniverse books:

    “My attitude toward iUniverse is unlike the horde of what I call the slap-fighters on the POD blogs and message boards. I am tiring of the snotty attitudes of those people, both the ones who have their own blogs and those who just pop up and dominate message boards created by others. I have only three negative things to say about iU: price, price, and price. They charge too much in set-up fees, book retail prices, and wholesale prices to the authors. Absolutely everything else I can say about the company is professional and positive. I have no interest in supporting competing companies, so this offer is for iU authors only.” (For the rest of this post, which explains the why and how of his service, please click here.)

    From the list of reviewed books thus far, Mr. Orr has not suffered a shortage of reading material by limiting submissions to iUniverse. He also posts interviews with authors and agents, and other interesting tidbits of POD publishing. I’m looking forward to spending more time on his website and seeing what gems I can find that have never made it to The New York Times Book Review.

    I’m really glad that Mr. Orr contacted me and made me aware of his website. If any one else out there has a “business” of reviewing POD books, please let me know and I’ll be happy to post a link to your website. Or you can leave a comment and provide your contact information there.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Face lift and added functionality among other things

    May 14th, 2008

    I decided I needed a little more color in my life so I changed “themes” yesterday. I hope to add some “texture” eventually as I learn how to edit CSS so I can add background images. Although I really liked my previous theme, this one feels more cheery yet appropriately subdued for the introvert that I am. I’ve also added some RSS widgets (scroll down the sidebar) for my most favorite websites & blogs, a few of which I’ve discussed in earlier posts. So now you’ll have three ways to connect with the sites that I talk about: link directly through my posts, links saved on my sidebar, or the RSS widgets through my sidebar.

    Did you know that you can get a feed to The New Yorker’s fiction and poetry? Now with my aircard and laptap, I never have to worry about missing an issue! See for yourself–click here.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • All Things Ebooks

    May 12th, 2008

    A website after my own heart?  I could spend hours on Ebook Crossroads without exhausting all the information that it has to offer.  The site claims to be the “One-stop Resource for eBook Writing and Publishing,” and it may well be given the list of reviews, products, and general info that it provides.  Navigation on Ebook Crossroads is quite smooth, with a choice of general topics on the left-hand side of the webpage  and specific sections on the right-hand side.

    You’ll find resources for writers of children’s literature, mystery, poetry, romance, and science fiction; listings for freelance jobs, writing contests, and writing associations; software and electronic reviews; and info on epublishing with ebooks, newsletters, and private label rights.  A lot of the resources provided are geared toward making money, whether through your own writing and/or affiliate programs.

    In short, it’s a fun site with lots of great links!  Enjoy!

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • One Story

    May 7th, 2008

    I’ve been smitten with a wonderful source of short fiction: One Story. A non-profit literary magazine, One Story publishes one story at a time in a print format small enough to fit into a small bag or purse. The stories are between 3,000 and 8,000 words long, and so most can be read in one sitting. I’ve been a subscriber for only a short time, but already I’ve enjoyed stories ranging from the hilarious yet strangely poignant “Bar Joke, Arizona” by Sam Allingham to the deceptively simple “Familial Kindness” by Kirsten Sundberg Lunstrum. One Story is dedicated to publishing new writers as well as those with long lists of publications such as Ron Carlson.

    Subscription and submission information can be found at the One Story website as well as other great features including interviews with writers, news of reading events, and reader discussions. Enjoy!

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • The Center Cannot Hold

    May 4th, 2008

    I’ve just finished reading Elyn R. Saks’ memoir, The Center Cannot Hold, a moving narrative of her journey from her first commitment as a mental patient in Oxford, England, to a professor at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law and an adjunct professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego. I found Saks’ story both compelling and horrifying. The writing draws you in, then holds you firm, even as you struggle to pull away from the more frightening passages.

    When a young adult, Saks was diagnosed as a schizophrenic and sentenced to life-long medication and therapy. What is particularly horrifying about her story is that Saks delineates a clear trajectory from the obsessions and night traumas that she experienced when she was 8 years old, to her disintegration into full-blown schizophrenia when she was a student at Oxford. A lot happened in those intervening years, a lot of signs and symptoms were evident, but not understood.

    Saks describes schizophrenia as rolling “in like a slow fog, becoming imperceptibly thicker as time goes on.” Her narrative reads much the same way, slowing covering the reader with a soft fog of strange thoughts and behavior, which gets thicker with Saks’ increasingly erratic and violent behavior. Although she assures the reader that she is not the only “success” story, it is hard to imagine anyone surviving the hospitalizations and forced medications that she had to endure, much less the heartbreaking realization that you are not in control of your own mind.

    In spite of her illness, Saks managed to develop a very tight network of friends who seemed to be almost preternatural in their support of her. She comes from a middle-class family and learned early on to be stubborn, to “never surrender.” She is brilliant and has enjoyed academic success from her undergraduate days forward; although, much of this success occurred despite her illness and often to her astonishment. She acknowledges “the ticket [she] drew in the lottery: parents with resources, access to trained and talented professionals, and frequently unattractive stubborn streak . . ..” The purpose of her book is not to say that anyone with a mental illness can be as successful as she has been. There are too many externalities, too many other parameters the mentally ill person has no control over.

    Saks wrote this book because she knows what it’s like to be psychotic, and she knows painfully well how the law treats mental patients: what it feels like to be put in restraints, to be forced to take medication, to be threatened with institutionalization. It’s become her life’s work to advocate for the right to self-determination for people with mental illness.

    Saks notes that writing this book was not entirely her own effort: “In terms of the actual writing of the book, two people have played central roles.” The Center Cannot Hold is a true testament to one individual’s fight against the odds, but the four-page Acknowledgments at the end are also a testament to that individual’s need for love and support in order to survive.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Blog tournament

    May 1st, 2008

    Check out John Hewitt’s blog tournament on the Writer’s Resource Center. The tournament started in March and you can read all the posts in the archive March Writing Blog Madness. I do regret that I stumbled across this tournament only today, especially since it’s been going on since March. So many blogs, so little time! But I already knew and liked John’s blog, so I really have no excuse for missing this. Some of my favorite blogs got in the tournament, but there’s quite a few I hadn’t heard of. What a fun way to raise their visibility and provide the rest of us with more blog-hopping opportunities.

    In keeping with the style of basketball’s March Madness, John proposed to “use rankings to help determine who will enter the tournament and at what level. … The rankings were determined by a simple formula based on the blog’s Google Page Rank and Alexa Site Rank” (original quote). Thirty-two blogs were selected to be in the tournament. I’m not going to say who won–that’s for you to find out at the archive.

    It’s a grueling game, and John really puts the blogs to the challenge. His judging criteria (which I’ve copied directly from his post) were:

    • Archives: This is the heart of a site. Substance is the key to a good blog. What are the best articles and how good are they?
    • Design: Substance is great, but flash does count for something. A site that is pleasant to look at makes a difference.
    • Usability and Navigation: This is the second half of the design puzzle. How easy is it to move around the site and get to the best stuff? Can find the best articles?
    • Purpose: What is the blog supposed to be about and what is the blog really about?
    • Personality: Some sites thrive on the writer’s personality and others stick to the information without giving any hints about the writer.
    • Five Most Recent Posts: This category is all about what the blogger has done lately. How good are the most recent articles and how often do they appear.

    These criteria are useful for newbie bloggers like myself. I can already see that I have such a long road ahead of me …

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
←Previous Page
1 … 118 119 120 121 122
Next Page→

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Marie at 1 Write Way
    • Join 2,358 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Marie at 1 Write Way
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d