Skip to content
  • Home
  • My Story
  • Book Reviews
  • Contact Me

Marie at 1 Write Way

  • Literary Agents Online

    November 30th, 2008

    I subscribe to a few literary agent blogs:  Nathan Bransford-Literary Agent, Bookends, LLC–A Literary Agency, and Lyons Literary LLC.  I’m sure there’s plenty more out there, but these suffice for my limited perusing time.  The great part of these blogs is that they are interactive:  that is, their posts encourage lively discussion, and they sometimes offer free critiques which they then post as part of their blog.  They are educational, which is their greatest appeal to me.  Although I’m not yet peddling a novel, it’s never too early to learn about agents, that crucial link between you and publication.

    literary agents, literary agent blogs, writing, publication, novels

    Powered by ScribeFire.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • The Horror of Women Writers

    October 26th, 2008

    Sunday’s NY Times Book Review section has a great essay by Terrence Rafferty called Shelley’s Daughters. Rafferty remarks on the irony that the “mother” of the horror novel gave birth to more sons than daughters, e.g., Poe, King, Lovecraft. And the few daughters she may claim did not always write prolifically in the genre of horror (Rafferty mentions Shirley Jackson and Charlotte Perkins Gilman to support this observation). The best part of his essay, of course, is the brief reviews he gives of contemporary women writers of horror. Don’t, however, expect to find reviews of the popular vampire novels by Laurell K. Hamilton and Stephenie Meyer: Rafferty notes that their novels “don’t appear to be concerned, as true horror, should be, with actually frightening the reader.” Rather, he comments on novels by Sara Gran, Alexandra Sokoloff, Sarah Langan, and Elizabeth Hand; writers new to me, but whose work I look forward to reading (especially, Langan whose novel The Keeper I just ordered).

    Frankly, I would love to write ** good ** horror. I tried my hand at it in last year’s National Novel Writing Month and, most recently, in a short story that has been revised multiple times. But writing horror is much more difficult than I thought it would be. Anyone can write gory scenes of zombies eating humans or ghosts wielding axes and chopping off body parts; but to instill cold prickly fear in the reader requires skill and precision. I grew up addicted to horror films, mostly from Great Britain but pre-Hammer Film Productions, and the ones that always scared me the most were those that were heavy on suspense: What’s behind the door? Is the monster there? Should our hero open it? What’s behind the door?

    Writing horror down is not for the feint of heart.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Max the Manx

    October 20th, 2008

    If I had known that I would never see Max again, I would have taken his picture so I could share him with all of you. I’d want you all to see his tiny green eyes staring up at me from the folds of the cloth bag that he nestled in. I gazed down at his eyes every time I stopped for a red light as I drove us from J. Lewis Hall Park in Woodville to the Northwood Animal Hospital in Tallahassee. 

    I had first met Max only 15 minutes earlier: a small ball of gray fur that fit easily into my husband’s hand. My husband had been biking when he saw the frightened kitten on the St. Marks Trail. When he saw that the kitten had a wound, we decided to take him to Northwood.

    At the hospital we were told that the kitten was a Manx—he was born without a tail—but there was a wound on his bottom, a wound that was infested with maggots. My husband and I agreed to take full financial responsibility for the kitten so he would have a chance at survival.

    We went to dinner and talked excitedly about making a home for … Max. Within minutes of leaving him at the hospital, we had named him. Max the Manx. We talked about how we could safely and slowly introduce him to our three geriatric cats. All of them had been strays at one time; Max would be in good company. We ignored the obvious—the maggots and the “septic tank” smell that had emanated from Max.

    So we weren’t prepared for the call from the Northwood Animal Hospital. We weren’t prepared to hear that Max had been euthanized because his condition was too far gone. Max had not only been born without a tail, but also without a rectum, a condition called “Manx Syndrome.” His bladder was hard as a rock, and his feces were backed up into his abdomen. He was in pain, and there was nothing else the veterinarians could have done for him.

    Worse than my sense of loss was the realization that someone had purposely left Max to suffer and die. His death might have been inevitable, but his suffering wasn’t. He could have been dropped off at any emergency animal hospital. 

    Our only comfort now, when we think of Max, is that at least for the last few hours of his life, he was in the hands of people who cared about him. I only wish he had started life that way.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • The Autobiography of a Half-Baked Indian

    October 5th, 2008

    So, how many of you have read The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga?  Mr. Adiga’s novel is a headspinner for those who have always thought of India as a sacred, spiritual mecca, blessedly innocent of the worst of human kind.  For the White Tiger (aka Balram, the main character), there are two Indias:  one of light, and one of darkness, and the Mother Ganga flows through the India of darkness.  The novel is the story of Balram’s journey from the poor abused son of a rickshaw puller to a wealthy man of tomorrow, an entrepreneur in Bangalore.  The political corruption and mafia-style business dealings that Balram observes along the way are nothing new to any American who stays abreast of US news, except that this is all taking place in India, the land of Ghandi.  And the corruption is so blatant, so “business as usual,” that one cannot be too surprised at the lengths to which Balram goes to secure his freedom.

    Balram tells his story through letters to a Chinese dignitary, who he heard is planning to visit Bangalore.  A novel of letters is not a new technique, but it takes considerable skill to pull off well.  And Adiga does pull it off.  He has created a story so riveting that I could barely stop reading long enough to sleep or to drive myself to work.  And he created a character in Balram that I couldn’t help but want only the best for, even while he was commiting the worst of crimes.  He is undereducated but astute enough to take the insult of being called “half-baked” and turn into a lofty title, thus his “autobiography of a half-baked Indian,” thus his story.

    I hope Adiga wins the Booker Prize.  The White Tiger is one of the most exciting stories I’ve read in a long, long time.

    Powered by ScribeFire.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • An Irrational Enterprise

    September 24th, 2008

    Last Sunday’s New York Times has a great article by David Gessner about writing and teaching and survival as a writer in the academy.  Read the entire article here.  Gessner writes eloquently about the sense of captivity that some writers may feel, compelled as they are to work for a steady paycheck but losing valuable writing (and reading) time in the process.  Not to mention being stuck having to read endless essays by naive but earnest students.  He offers the example of prize-winning author, Wallace Stegner, as a kind of a balm:  yes, you can do both and do both well, even if your heart isn’t in teaching.  Stegner, apparently, embraced his retirement from teaching as the time to open the floodgates of his creativity.  On the flip side, some of Gessner’s follow writers/teachers admit that they need the structure of teaching (or any day job probably) to keep from having too much time:  

    “I have two writer friends, successful novelists who could afford not to teach, who insist that rather than detract from their writing, their lives as professors are what allow them to write, and that given more free time, they would crumble.  The job provides a safety net above the abyss of facing the difficulty of creating every day, making an irrational thing feel more ration.” 

    That resonates with me.  I have a day job, a rather mentally consuming day job (not teaching), that forces me to structure my time, to keep a schedule, so that I have to write only when I can grab the time.  I don’t have my days yawning before me, empty of everything but writing.  That would scare me as much it would scare Gessner’s friends.  I would have to at least do some laundry, something rational.  Because as Gessner notes, “the creation of literature requires a degree of monomania, and that it is, at least in part, an irrational enterprise.”  

    For me, then, the “balance” is not so much balancing my job with my writing as much as balancing the rational with the irrational.  For someone from a working-class background (and an area of chronic low employment), this makes a lot of sense.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Scribefire

    September 21st, 2008

    Well, I wasted no time in trying out this Firefox add-on recommended by BJ Keltz.  Very easy to install and set-up.  Apparently, I can post entries to other blogs I might have, and Scribefire also provides a list of my entries and categories.  I can tag, too, and have my post bookmarked for del.icio.us.  So far, I am happy.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Writing and Journaling

    September 21st, 2008

    I came across a neat WordPress & writing sister this morning:  BJ Keltz at Write Your Mind Journals. In full disclosure, BJ has me on her blogroll.  I’ve gotten a couple of hits from that, so I thought I should check her out (and return the favor).  BJ blogs about her business (selling writing journals) and writing.  Her blog is visually appealing, and her entries about journaling will strike a chord in any writer who sees writing as a tool as well as an art.  I highly recommend that you click on the tab “Tools of the Trade.”  BJ reviews a number of Firefox add-ons that she uses for writing.  I am definitely going to check them out — if I can ever get Firefox 3.0 to stay installed on my Mac OS.  

    To the right of her blog, you’ll find a link to her store.  I have not (yet) purchased anything from BJ, but I am sorely tempted.  I’m a bit of a journal collector, and I love browsing through journals when I’m at a bookstore (or any store, even Target sells journals!).  But I promised myself I wouldn’t buy any more journals until I had filled all the ones I have now … but you know what they say about promises :-)

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Writer’s Reality Check

    September 14th, 2008

    JA Konrath, author of the Lt. Jacqueline “Jack” Daniels thriller series, has a great blog at  A Newbie’s Guide to Publishing.  In particular, check out his “Brain Check” post.  JA provides a list of instructions for writers trying to persevere in this information-laden and book-heavy age:

    1.  Study the situation.

    2.  Set attainable goals.

    3.  Learn from both failure and success.

    4.  Don’t compare yourself to other writers.

    5. Value yourself.

    6.  Bust your ass.

    7.  Forgive.

    8.  Dream.

    Read JA’s full post for his elaborations on each item.  I struggle the most with items 4 and 5.  I’m always comparing myself to other writers.  That can be OK if I’m thinking, “gee, I can write as well as that,” but most of the time I’m thinking, “gee, I wish I had her gift for plot” or “gee, I wish I had his talent for humor.”  The thing is I love to read and the second best way to learn about writing is to read (the first is, of course, to write), so not comparing myself to other writers is an ongoing struggle.  

    I definitely don’t value my writing as much as I should.  I’ve received enough encouragement from other writers to keep going, but I need to learn to be my own encouragement.  At the end of the day, I have to value what I do.  Unfortunately, I wasn’t raised to value my writing, so it is, yet another, ongoing struggle.  

    And what keeps me from busting my ass is my perpetual self-criticism and doubt.  Hmmm … enough excuses already, don’t you think?

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Weaving a Way Home: Book Review

    August 11th, 2008

    Leslie Van Gelder’s Weaving a Way Home.  A Personal Journey Exploring Place and Story (University of Michigan Press) is a complex and evocative dissertation on concepts and intersections of a sense of place, storyingtelling, and anthromophorization in an anthropocentric world.  Her writing is fluid, blending personal stories with extensive quotes from writers as diverse as Gary Snyder, Barry Lopez, and Calvin Luther Martin.  

    I was ”hooked“ into reading her book by a single line:  “Both of my parents gave me a life rich in experience.  Both died too young.” (page 7) The death of her parents, particularly her father’s death, prompted her to consider “questions of story and place” (page 9), and to study the fine distinctions between wilderness and wildland and the wildness within all of us.  

    The divestment of a parent’s belongings can provoke a reel of memories that one had thought was long-forgotten.  In my own family, the death of an aunt or uncle will draw stories from my cousins who live scattered across the United States:  all those stories will be centered in our “authentic homeland,” upstate New York, where my aunts and uncles and most of my cousins grew up.  These stories or shared memories are what give us our sense of home:  

    ”The desire for an “authentic homeland” is about wanting to look around and find ourselves surrounded by kin–the people of whom we are a part–with faces like ours, eyes, hands, the same names and language.  More important, we want to be with people who share the memories of the same set of stories, our stories.  Our continuum ensures that our people will exist after we are gone and that we are carrying their nature in us.  We want the senses of being of and from to be one.“  (page 69)

    Even those cousins who were born and raised thousands of miles from the ”authentic homeland“ can lay claim to it through their parents’ stories and the stories they made through their visits.  Ironically, death may tie us to our homeland more than life itself.

    Van Gelder also draws from her varied and rich travel experiences to support her thesis of storytelling as that which connects us to each other and to our environment.  From Baie de Ha Ha to Cyprus to Africa to New Zealand to New Jersey, Van Gelder weaves a tapestry of stories that give meaning to her life.  

    The first several chapters of her book focus on the ideas of wilderness, wildness, and wildland:  “Wilderness, wildness, and wildland are three terms I have used refer to similar places, but they mean very different things.”  (page 20)  Wilderness is the unknown, wildland is the known, but in both cases, humans are not the dominant inhabitants.   “Wilderness becomes wildland when it becomes known to us.  Fear is replaced by recognition, memory, and story.” (page 41).  Wildness is not a place, but a state of being:  “Wildness is the state of being open to the unknown.” (page 53)  Experiencing wildness can be found in something as literal as canoeing down an old, forgotten canal or as subtle (and yet life-changing) as leaving one’s “authentic homeland” for a strange urban jungle on the other side of the continent.

    Van Gelder’s meditations on wilderness and wildland resonate because we are continually massaging our concepts of wilderness and wildland in the political realm.  Van Gelder notes that “[t]he intent of the Wilderness Act is to deliberately preserve wildness from humanness.” (page 24)  What happens to the wildness of ANWR if it is opened to oil drilling?  What happens to the wilderness off the coast of Florida if oil drilling is allowed?  Van Gelder’s meditations and the discourse of her own experiences help us see that our relationships to these wilderness places will be irrevocably (and regrettably) changed by human manipulation.  

    Contemporary society is anthropocentric:  to be human is to be all.  Van Gelder traces our evolution from anthropomorphic hunter-gatherers to anthropocentric agrarians.  Fear of starvation is one explanation for why our species began to plant and (more importantly) stockpile food.  Animals became objectified as something we eat for the sake of our own survival, not as sentient creatures with which we coexist.  The more anthropocentric we’ve become, the stronger the antipathy we feel toward the “other,” whether the other be a wildebeast, a swamp, or an iceberg.  We’ve alienated ourselves from the very wilderness and wildlands that nurtured our evolution.  

    Van Gelder’s tapestry of a book is not smooth to the touch.  Heavy slubs of wools poke up here and there when she digresses into academic recitations.  Her tendency to define terms such as wildness in several different ways as if she were thinking out loud tested my patience at times.  But her stories about her parents, her parents-in-law, her husband, her friends, and herself are colorful threads that often make  reading Weaving a Way Home a poignant joy.  Her love for family and friends and the wilderness and wildlands of her life bind her tapestry in place and make a dense and beautiful fabric.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Yet Another Glass Ceiling

    July 27th, 2008

    We have finally arrived at a point in our maturity as a society that a woman could at least be a serious contender for the presidency.  Women of my generation have had the satisfaction of seeing glass ceilings shattered, from corporate offices to the US Supreme Court.  But where one glass ceiling may be removed, another will take its place.  According to this Sunday’s NY Times, the blogosphere (purportedly a true democratic marketplace of ideas) has its own glass ceiling. The article states that while 14% of men and 11% of women blog, women’s contributions to the web are much less likely than men’s to be noted:  “Yet, when Techcult, a technology Web site, recently listed its top 100 Web celebrities, only 11 of them were women. Last year, Forbes.com ran a similar list, naming 3 women on its list of 25″ (click here for the full NY Times article).  

    Sigh.  Do female bloggers need to use male pseudonyms to be taken seriously, as did our scribbling ancestor George Eliot (nee Mary Ann Evans)?  Consider Techcult’s methodology for selecting the “top 100 Web celebrities”:

    “We gathered around 200 potential names and queried them on Google to see how many results they would generate. Some minor adjustments were made, and the 100 names with the highest number of results were profiled […]” (click here to read the full article).  As someone who works in the social sciences, I had to wince when I read this.  So not scientific!  From whom did they gather 200 names?  If you were not in that first 200, then you were SOL.  Judging from the comments to the article, a number of male “Web celebrities” were overlooked, but, really, only 11 out of 100 are women in this list?  And one of the women is Tila Tequila?

    Perhaps my sister bloggers should take comfort in knowing that at least this list was so unscientifically produced but it’s not worth taking seriously … except that it’s cited in the NY Times, thereby giving it a broader reach than it deserves.  But let’s take heart.  The blogosphere is relatively new, and it is a great tool with which to connect with each other, giving us a strength in numbers that would have been unimaginable in the days of Elizabeth Cady Stanton.  We can start by joining networks such as BlogHer.

    Blog on, sisters!

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
←Previous Page
1 … 114 115 116 117 118 … 122
Next Page→

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Marie at 1 Write Way
    • Join 2,358 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Marie at 1 Write Way
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d