Skip to content
  • Home
  • My Story
  • Book Reviews
  • Contact Me

Marie at 1 Write Way

  • And then back again

    February 17th, 2013

    After a 3 years’ absence, I’ve decided to re-enter the blogosphere but with a different purpose. I simply want to write, and I’m tired of writing in my head. Initially, this blog was to be a resource to me and anyone who happened by, a writing resource with links to websites and other blogs devoted to the art and science of writing. I wanted to be useful. I didn’t want to write about Me. I didn’t think anyone would be interested in Me. But recently I finished reading Quiet by Susan Cain and now that I have a better understanding of myself (shy, sensitive introvert that I am), I want to make the jump from thinking nobody would care to I don’t care if nobody would care … about Me. I want to write.

    Writing used to be a way to hide from a world that frightened and confused me. I was very introverted as a child, no doubt in part because I needed but didn’t get glasses until I was 10. Everything scared me. Life scared me. And yet there were times when I could act outgoing, although I don’t think anyone much liked me when I was like that. I was very emotional, would cry if anyone looked at me the wrong way, and crying wasn’t something tolerated very well in my home. It was a sign of weakness. Which meant I cried a lot.

    I wrote trying to imagine having some control over my life, wanting to believe I had a better relationship with my family than I did. Wanting to believe that at the end of the day, they loved me. As a young adult living away from home, I wrote in journals, trying to decipher the world around me. I had moved to a place radically different from the one I grew up in. I embraced “sex, drugs, and rock n’ roll” and spent too many years making a mess of myself. And writing very little.

    I went back to school, took writing classes, tried using my writing as I had in the past, to work through and survive both physical and emotional trauma. What I always lacked was confidence. I never wrote with any real confidence in my writing. When anyone did try to support me (most often, a teacher), I almost literally ran the other way. I don’t know what I was afraid of: most likely, failure, but what kind of failure? I grew up feeling like a fraud, and I still harbor some of that today. I’m afraid I will disappoint. I disappoint myself every day, but I’m used to it.  I hate disappointing others. And without confidence in myself, I couldn’t very well use the support given to me. Only a fraud would do that.

    So now, decades later, I have very little to show for my writing. I’m way past the halfway mark of my life, and I do have many regrets, not the least of which is I didn’t write more. I might have had a different story if the internet had been around when I was young and isolated. Although there is a lot of crap out there, I’ve come across writers that I never would have known if it wasn’t for the internet. They are not all published writers, but they write. They seize the opportunities that the internet provides. I think some of them might even be shy, sensitive introverts like myself.

    I have regrets and some of those regrets I can do nothing about. But the regret that I didn’t write more … I don’t have to die with that regret. That one I can change.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Well, now I understand …

    January 24th, 2010

    Well, now I understand why there are so few new authors in bookstores. See NY times article about James Patterson, Inc. http://ow.ly/ZV6v

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • The Fight for Digital Publishing Rights

    December 13th, 2009

    Despite the disparaging of e-books as cold, hard, unfriendly sources of reading, traditional publishers apparently think there’s money to be made through publishing in “electronic book publishing formats.”  The authors may be long-dead, but their publishers are in a tussle with their estates over who owns whose rights.  In the case of William Styron’s books, Random House expects to “continue to publish the Styron books we own in all formats, including e-books.”  (Click here for the full story.)  Hmmm … the Styron books they own?  OK, I understand that traditional publishers invest capital and even some sweat equity in an author’s work, but just who wrote Styron’s books?  Could they maybe express it differently … say, they expect to publish to the books that they bought rights to?  I know I probably sound like I’m splitting hairs, but wouldn’t any author wince to hear a publisher say that he “owns” the author’s books?

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • When Not Writing is Writing …

    December 6th, 2009

    In a recent post, Fiona Robyn mused, “Most of the time being a writer is about looking out at the frosted grass, and sipping earl grey, and not writing.”  Sometimes I think I do my best writing when I’m knitting or crocheting or sewing, when my hands are occupied with something other than typing.  Even playing mindless computer games sometimes brings forth the crucial bit of action to move my story or novel forward (if I can ever pull myself away from the mindless computer game).  I grew up with the notion that a “true” writer is constantly writing, at least scribbling in a notebook at every free moment.  A “true” writer cannot do anything but write, write, write.

    I wonder.  Part of what drives me to write is the joy of creation, much the same joy that I feel when I knit, crochet, sew (but not when I play mindless computer games).  Writing is like piecing together a quilt, or watching a deceptively simple looking pattern unfold from an eye-crossing knitting schematic.  Unfortunately, I cannot wear my writing (except on my sleeve) like I can wear the scarves, shawls, sweaters I create.  I can’t even use my writing to cover my bed like I would a quilt (well, technically I could, but it wouldn’t be as warm and cozy).  If I were a full-time writer, or even a full-time knitter, crocheter, sewer, this would not be too much of a problem.  But I am a writer with a day job, something that has nothing to do with writing novels or stories, or knitting up scarves and shawls, or piecing quilts.  Time is finite and I want to do it all — the whole creative process that, for me, starts with the hands (knitting, crocheting, sewing, typing, hand writing) and continues through the mind.  However and whenever the words make it to the page, I am a writer.  It’s not the frequency of my writing.  It’s just the fact that I do write.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Coming up for air

    November 29th, 2009

    I am slowly … ever so slowly … getting back into writing.  I’ve been on a self-enforced hiatus for the last several months, where I allowed myself to be suck up into a lifestyle that I wasn’t enjoying a whole lot because it left virtually no time (or energy, which is more important) for writing.  I’m writing this post with a bit of trepidation … am I really ready to take up my blog again?  Or am I just going to make one lame post and then disappear from the blogosphere for an undetermined length of time?

    Well, I’m here now, and I think that’s all that really counts …  And it’s not like I’ve been totally unproductive.  During my hiatus, I’ve had the pleasure of coming across a delightful blog called Dollar Bin Horror.  It’s a fun blog by “Rhonny Reaper” (not entirely her real name, of course) where she writes about finding great horror films for cheap and also interviews horror writers.  Yes, one of my (many) guilty pleasures is horror films, especially the old classics with Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi, and Roger Corman films.  Check out Dollar Bin Horror and see why I’ve been smittened.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • We the Paparazzi

    August 9th, 2009

    In some venues, the freedom to tweet, tag, or snap is being denied.  Clubs are denying entry to anyone who takes pictures of other groups at the club and then posts them to Facebook.  A storytelling venue prohibits tweeting during the show.  An article in this Sunday’s NY Times talks about a new social media phenomenon, the idea that “some [people] are tired of living their lives on the Web,” and that others  are finding that “there’s something magical about a life less posted.”  In Party On, But No Tweets, Allen Salkin chronicles the disenchantment some folks are having with the chronicling of daily life, in particular, the minutae of daily life.  Not too mention the embarrassment of suddenly finding yourself tagged in unbecoming photo scapes of parties gone wild.

    I was wondering when, if ever, the mind-numbing ubiquity of social media would catch up with us.  Are we really “products just to be harvested.”  Is that all social media has to offer:  a commodification of ourselves?  We are valued by the number of followers we have on Twitter, by the number of friends we have on Facebook, by the number of social media where our blogs are listed, by the number of pictures in which we are tagged.  We become the merchandise that we sell.  So what happens with that other product–our writing–that was the point of all this social media?  At least for someone like myself, who came to the game rather late, the writing suffers the most.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • An American Tradition Is A New Literary Market

    July 12th, 2009

    The Saturday Evening Post has “revamped” and is looking for new fiction.  With the dwindling newspaper and magazine market, this is a bold effort by the Post.  Hopefully, readers will be rewarded by good, fresh writing.  Click here for the Post’s submission guidelines.  My thanks to fellow blogger, Georganna Hancock of A Writer’s Edge, for tweeting this truly news-worthy info.  This is great news for someone who has fond memories of reading the Post when she was much much younger than she is today :-)

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Self-publishing field continues to grow

    June 14th, 2009

    Another website has opened up, to give self-published authors more visibility:  IndieReader.com.  Read the article here in the Christian Science Monitor.  IndieReader.com describes itself as being “For self-published and print-on-demand books and the readers who love them.”  Founder Amy Holman Edelman proposes to do for self-published books what Sundance has done for independent films.  For an annual fee of $149, IndieReader.com will “promote, market and sell your book” on its website, if they deem your book to have met “certain standards of quality, both in terms of basic spelling and grammatical errors and content. All books must be well written and offer something of value to our customers.”  Be sure to always read the fine print when $$ is involved.  From the IndieReader.com Terms of Service:

    2. Annual Fees and Costs. a. The fee for inclusion on the website is $149.00 per year, regardless of the number of books that each author features on the IR site. The fee for submitting the first book is included in the annual fee, however, there will be a submission fee of $25 for each book after the first. b. This fee is NON-REFUNDABLE.

    IndieReader.com is a business and as such should charge fees, and it should reserve its right to reject books that don’t meet its standards.  Yes, that makes it sound more like traditional publishing with all its gatekeepers, but IndieReader.com holds the promise of access to good writing, regardless of the author’s name recognition.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Fat

    May 31st, 2009

    This is off the writing track, but it’s one of my pet peeves that gets peaked now and then:  fat as in body weight and body image.  Here’s an excellent article in the Sunday NY Times revealing how celebrities contribute to our (at least, women’s) shaky self-image:  Bingeing on Celebrity Weight Battles

    My suggestion:  Why don’t we start by not using the word “fat” to describe people.  It’s derogatory, not descriptive.  It demoralizes rather than motivates.  And it’s an industry fed by celebrities, Big Pharma, agribusiness … (pun intended) that needs consumers to be self-conscious about their weight in order to survive.  Best quote: “Americans equate body size with Puritan values. Thin means self-discipline and hard work; fat implies laziness, gluttony and lack of willpower.”  Watch enough TV and you’ll see ads for weight-loss gimmicks following ads for all you can eat country buffets. How can we demand self-discipline when our society relentlessly throws temptation in our way?  Maybe I’m just bitter because I know I’ll never see 120 again (unless I get ravished by cancer), or maybe I just want to enjoy life (and some chocolate) while it’s here.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • The Reality of Being You

    May 10th, 2009

    “Depression, truth be told, is both boring and threatening as a subject of conversation.”  So writes Daphne Merkin in her essay on depression in this Sunday’s New York Times Magazine.  As someone who has struggled with depression and anxiety off and on (and, lately, fortunately, it’s been mostly off), Merkin’s essay resonated with me in a far deeper way than any essay I had read before.  Perhaps it’s the cold truth of her insights:  “Surely this is the worst part of being at the mercy of your own mind, . . .:  the fact that there is no way out of the reality of being you, . . ..”

    For most of my life, I found the reality of “being me” often hard to bear.  Like Merkin, “I was fascinated by people who had the temerity to bring down the curtain on their own suffering,” people like Virginia Woolf, Anne Sexton, and Sylvia Plath, who also just happened to be writers.

    Merkin takes us on a journey from her most recent bout of deep depression, through her attempts at recovery in a clinic, and, finally, to a seemingly spontaneous resolution.  Granted, this is her own personal story, and others who suffer from chronic depression might have very different experiences.  As with so many other ailments, both physical and psychological, one size does not fit all.  But I finished Merkin’s article feeling heartened, at the least because the fog lifts just enough for her to imagine a life without it.

    Powered by ScribeFire.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
←Previous Page
1 … 111 112 113 114 115 … 122
Next Page→

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Marie at 1 Write Way
    • Join 2,358 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Marie at 1 Write Way
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d