• Home
  • My Story
  • Book Reviews
  • Contact Me

Marie at 1 Write Way

  • The Autobiography of a Half-Baked Indian

    October 5th, 2008

    So, how many of you have read The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga?  Mr. Adiga’s novel is a headspinner for those who have always thought of India as a sacred, spiritual mecca, blessedly innocent of the worst of human kind.  For the White Tiger (aka Balram, the main character), there are two Indias:  one of light, and one of darkness, and the Mother Ganga flows through the India of darkness.  The novel is the story of Balram’s journey from the poor abused son of a rickshaw puller to a wealthy man of tomorrow, an entrepreneur in Bangalore.  The political corruption and mafia-style business dealings that Balram observes along the way are nothing new to any American who stays abreast of US news, except that this is all taking place in India, the land of Ghandi.  And the corruption is so blatant, so “business as usual,” that one cannot be too surprised at the lengths to which Balram goes to secure his freedom.

    Balram tells his story through letters to a Chinese dignitary, who he heard is planning to visit Bangalore.  A novel of letters is not a new technique, but it takes considerable skill to pull off well.  And Adiga does pull it off.  He has created a story so riveting that I could barely stop reading long enough to sleep or to drive myself to work.  And he created a character in Balram that I couldn’t help but want only the best for, even while he was commiting the worst of crimes.  He is undereducated but astute enough to take the insult of being called “half-baked” and turn into a lofty title, thus his “autobiography of a half-baked Indian,” thus his story.

    I hope Adiga wins the Booker Prize.  The White Tiger is one of the most exciting stories I’ve read in a long, long time.

    Powered by ScribeFire.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • An Irrational Enterprise

    September 24th, 2008

    Last Sunday’s New York Times has a great article by David Gessner about writing and teaching and survival as a writer in the academy.  Read the entire article here.  Gessner writes eloquently about the sense of captivity that some writers may feel, compelled as they are to work for a steady paycheck but losing valuable writing (and reading) time in the process.  Not to mention being stuck having to read endless essays by naive but earnest students.  He offers the example of prize-winning author, Wallace Stegner, as a kind of a balm:  yes, you can do both and do both well, even if your heart isn’t in teaching.  Stegner, apparently, embraced his retirement from teaching as the time to open the floodgates of his creativity.  On the flip side, some of Gessner’s follow writers/teachers admit that they need the structure of teaching (or any day job probably) to keep from having too much time:  

    “I have two writer friends, successful novelists who could afford not to teach, who insist that rather than detract from their writing, their lives as professors are what allow them to write, and that given more free time, they would crumble.  The job provides a safety net above the abyss of facing the difficulty of creating every day, making an irrational thing feel more ration.” 

    That resonates with me.  I have a day job, a rather mentally consuming day job (not teaching), that forces me to structure my time, to keep a schedule, so that I have to write only when I can grab the time.  I don’t have my days yawning before me, empty of everything but writing.  That would scare me as much it would scare Gessner’s friends.  I would have to at least do some laundry, something rational.  Because as Gessner notes, “the creation of literature requires a degree of monomania, and that it is, at least in part, an irrational enterprise.”  

    For me, then, the “balance” is not so much balancing my job with my writing as much as balancing the rational with the irrational.  For someone from a working-class background (and an area of chronic low employment), this makes a lot of sense.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Scribefire

    September 21st, 2008

    Well, I wasted no time in trying out this Firefox add-on recommended by BJ Keltz.  Very easy to install and set-up.  Apparently, I can post entries to other blogs I might have, and Scribefire also provides a list of my entries and categories.  I can tag, too, and have my post bookmarked for del.icio.us.  So far, I am happy.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Writing and Journaling

    September 21st, 2008

    I came across a neat WordPress & writing sister this morning:  BJ Keltz at Write Your Mind Journals. In full disclosure, BJ has me on her blogroll.  I’ve gotten a couple of hits from that, so I thought I should check her out (and return the favor).  BJ blogs about her business (selling writing journals) and writing.  Her blog is visually appealing, and her entries about journaling will strike a chord in any writer who sees writing as a tool as well as an art.  I highly recommend that you click on the tab “Tools of the Trade.”  BJ reviews a number of Firefox add-ons that she uses for writing.  I am definitely going to check them out — if I can ever get Firefox 3.0 to stay installed on my Mac OS.  

    To the right of her blog, you’ll find a link to her store.  I have not (yet) purchased anything from BJ, but I am sorely tempted.  I’m a bit of a journal collector, and I love browsing through journals when I’m at a bookstore (or any store, even Target sells journals!).  But I promised myself I wouldn’t buy any more journals until I had filled all the ones I have now … but you know what they say about promises :-)

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Writer’s Reality Check

    September 14th, 2008

    JA Konrath, author of the Lt. Jacqueline “Jack” Daniels thriller series, has a great blog at  A Newbie’s Guide to Publishing.  In particular, check out his “Brain Check” post.  JA provides a list of instructions for writers trying to persevere in this information-laden and book-heavy age:

    1.  Study the situation.

    2.  Set attainable goals.

    3.  Learn from both failure and success.

    4.  Don’t compare yourself to other writers.

    5. Value yourself.

    6.  Bust your ass.

    7.  Forgive.

    8.  Dream.

    Read JA’s full post for his elaborations on each item.  I struggle the most with items 4 and 5.  I’m always comparing myself to other writers.  That can be OK if I’m thinking, “gee, I can write as well as that,” but most of the time I’m thinking, “gee, I wish I had her gift for plot” or “gee, I wish I had his talent for humor.”  The thing is I love to read and the second best way to learn about writing is to read (the first is, of course, to write), so not comparing myself to other writers is an ongoing struggle.  

    I definitely don’t value my writing as much as I should.  I’ve received enough encouragement from other writers to keep going, but I need to learn to be my own encouragement.  At the end of the day, I have to value what I do.  Unfortunately, I wasn’t raised to value my writing, so it is, yet another, ongoing struggle.  

    And what keeps me from busting my ass is my perpetual self-criticism and doubt.  Hmmm … enough excuses already, don’t you think?

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Weaving a Way Home: Book Review

    August 11th, 2008

    Leslie Van Gelder’s Weaving a Way Home.  A Personal Journey Exploring Place and Story (University of Michigan Press) is a complex and evocative dissertation on concepts and intersections of a sense of place, storyingtelling, and anthromophorization in an anthropocentric world.  Her writing is fluid, blending personal stories with extensive quotes from writers as diverse as Gary Snyder, Barry Lopez, and Calvin Luther Martin.  

    I was ”hooked“ into reading her book by a single line:  “Both of my parents gave me a life rich in experience.  Both died too young.” (page 7) The death of her parents, particularly her father’s death, prompted her to consider “questions of story and place” (page 9), and to study the fine distinctions between wilderness and wildland and the wildness within all of us.  

    The divestment of a parent’s belongings can provoke a reel of memories that one had thought was long-forgotten.  In my own family, the death of an aunt or uncle will draw stories from my cousins who live scattered across the United States:  all those stories will be centered in our “authentic homeland,” upstate New York, where my aunts and uncles and most of my cousins grew up.  These stories or shared memories are what give us our sense of home:  

    ”The desire for an “authentic homeland” is about wanting to look around and find ourselves surrounded by kin–the people of whom we are a part–with faces like ours, eyes, hands, the same names and language.  More important, we want to be with people who share the memories of the same set of stories, our stories.  Our continuum ensures that our people will exist after we are gone and that we are carrying their nature in us.  We want the senses of being of and from to be one.“  (page 69)

    Even those cousins who were born and raised thousands of miles from the ”authentic homeland“ can lay claim to it through their parents’ stories and the stories they made through their visits.  Ironically, death may tie us to our homeland more than life itself.

    Van Gelder also draws from her varied and rich travel experiences to support her thesis of storytelling as that which connects us to each other and to our environment.  From Baie de Ha Ha to Cyprus to Africa to New Zealand to New Jersey, Van Gelder weaves a tapestry of stories that give meaning to her life.  

    The first several chapters of her book focus on the ideas of wilderness, wildness, and wildland:  “Wilderness, wildness, and wildland are three terms I have used refer to similar places, but they mean very different things.”  (page 20)  Wilderness is the unknown, wildland is the known, but in both cases, humans are not the dominant inhabitants.   “Wilderness becomes wildland when it becomes known to us.  Fear is replaced by recognition, memory, and story.” (page 41).  Wildness is not a place, but a state of being:  “Wildness is the state of being open to the unknown.” (page 53)  Experiencing wildness can be found in something as literal as canoeing down an old, forgotten canal or as subtle (and yet life-changing) as leaving one’s “authentic homeland” for a strange urban jungle on the other side of the continent.

    Van Gelder’s meditations on wilderness and wildland resonate because we are continually massaging our concepts of wilderness and wildland in the political realm.  Van Gelder notes that “[t]he intent of the Wilderness Act is to deliberately preserve wildness from humanness.” (page 24)  What happens to the wildness of ANWR if it is opened to oil drilling?  What happens to the wilderness off the coast of Florida if oil drilling is allowed?  Van Gelder’s meditations and the discourse of her own experiences help us see that our relationships to these wilderness places will be irrevocably (and regrettably) changed by human manipulation.  

    Contemporary society is anthropocentric:  to be human is to be all.  Van Gelder traces our evolution from anthropomorphic hunter-gatherers to anthropocentric agrarians.  Fear of starvation is one explanation for why our species began to plant and (more importantly) stockpile food.  Animals became objectified as something we eat for the sake of our own survival, not as sentient creatures with which we coexist.  The more anthropocentric we’ve become, the stronger the antipathy we feel toward the “other,” whether the other be a wildebeast, a swamp, or an iceberg.  We’ve alienated ourselves from the very wilderness and wildlands that nurtured our evolution.  

    Van Gelder’s tapestry of a book is not smooth to the touch.  Heavy slubs of wools poke up here and there when she digresses into academic recitations.  Her tendency to define terms such as wildness in several different ways as if she were thinking out loud tested my patience at times.  But her stories about her parents, her parents-in-law, her husband, her friends, and herself are colorful threads that often make  reading Weaving a Way Home a poignant joy.  Her love for family and friends and the wilderness and wildlands of her life bind her tapestry in place and make a dense and beautiful fabric.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Yet Another Glass Ceiling

    July 27th, 2008

    We have finally arrived at a point in our maturity as a society that a woman could at least be a serious contender for the presidency.  Women of my generation have had the satisfaction of seeing glass ceilings shattered, from corporate offices to the US Supreme Court.  But where one glass ceiling may be removed, another will take its place.  According to this Sunday’s NY Times, the blogosphere (purportedly a true democratic marketplace of ideas) has its own glass ceiling. The article states that while 14% of men and 11% of women blog, women’s contributions to the web are much less likely than men’s to be noted:  “Yet, when Techcult, a technology Web site, recently listed its top 100 Web celebrities, only 11 of them were women. Last year, Forbes.com ran a similar list, naming 3 women on its list of 25″ (click here for the full NY Times article).  

    Sigh.  Do female bloggers need to use male pseudonyms to be taken seriously, as did our scribbling ancestor George Eliot (nee Mary Ann Evans)?  Consider Techcult’s methodology for selecting the “top 100 Web celebrities”:

    “We gathered around 200 potential names and queried them on Google to see how many results they would generate. Some minor adjustments were made, and the 100 names with the highest number of results were profiled […]” (click here to read the full article).  As someone who works in the social sciences, I had to wince when I read this.  So not scientific!  From whom did they gather 200 names?  If you were not in that first 200, then you were SOL.  Judging from the comments to the article, a number of male “Web celebrities” were overlooked, but, really, only 11 out of 100 are women in this list?  And one of the women is Tila Tequila?

    Perhaps my sister bloggers should take comfort in knowing that at least this list was so unscientifically produced but it’s not worth taking seriously … except that it’s cited in the NY Times, thereby giving it a broader reach than it deserves.  But let’s take heart.  The blogosphere is relatively new, and it is a great tool with which to connect with each other, giving us a strength in numbers that would have been unimaginable in the days of Elizabeth Cady Stanton.  We can start by joining networks such as BlogHer.

    Blog on, sisters!

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • Interminable Writing

    July 26th, 2008

    I know that good writing can make me laugh, and I got more than a few chuckles over at The Interminable Writer.  The blog won my heart with this quote:

    “Writing is not necessarily something to be ashamed of, but do it in private and wash your hands afterward.” ~ Robert Heinlein

    KJ, the Interminable Writer, has that straight-talkin’, potty humor that reminds me of the late great Molly Ivins, except that KJ makes humor out of her writing (or efforts to write, hence her choice of quotes) while Ivins made her humor out of politics.

    Writing is a lonely, solitary business.  A sense of humor is necessary for survival, so if you ever need a quick pick-me-up, click on over to The Interminable Writer.

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • What does “MFA” stand for?

    July 20th, 2008

    Fellow blogger Chicklit provides this link to a great story by Margo Rabb, published in All-Story.  Rabb provides a funny and insightful perspective on MFA programs.  I’ve always had mixed feelings about MFA programs:  sometimes I want to enroll in the one at my local university, and take advantage of the “connections” I might be able to make; other times I want to just hole up with my laptop and write what I want to write, damn the critics.

    My opinion is colored by my own experience in a creative writing program (what my local university had before they developed an MFA program).  I was ostensibly a literature major but took writing workshops because I wanted to develop my writing.  So much of what I observed during the two years in that program are captured in Rabb’s story:  the favoritism, the unskilled (and thus worthless) workshop critiques, the sexual games among the students, the competition.  

    I was lucky in that most of the students in the program treated me kindly.  I had so little confidence in my writing that I obviously wasn’t a threat to any of them.  I also was happily married at that time (and still am … to the same guy even) and avoided the after-class bar and bed hops.   What disappointed me about the experience–and why I would loathed to attend writing workshops again–was the fact that I came out of it with no more confidence in my skill as a writer than I did going in.  

    Yes, I did receive praise for a couple of my stories from one of the more highly regarded workshop professors, and I even won a graduate student writing award (although that was for a literary essay, not a short story).  But what has unfortunately stayed with me was the high ridicule expressed over one of my stories during one workshop, a story that had an autobiographical basis.  I didn’t know how to deal with the humiliation, nor why I had to be humiliated, no matter how bad my story was.  Like the narrator of Rabb’s story, I wept bitterly.

    The fallibility of the workshop professor was also a disappointment.  His overt favoritism toward some students sparked ill-will within the group, and his was always the “last word” in the workshops.  One time I strongly argued on behalf of another student regarding a technique she had used in her story.  I said it worked; he said it didn’t.  His opinion squashed mine, which could have been OK if only I had been allowed to make my argument in full.  

    So I guess I still have some grudges–15+ years and counting.  But since then (and most recently), I’ve engaged a paid writing mentor who provided criticism and support, and found myself writing more in these past three years than I had in the previous ten.  I’ve also shared my stories with friends, again getting needed criticism but also much needed support.  I think my former professor would consider me delusional to rely solely on the feedback of friends and paid mentors.  But so what?  I am writing, and I am being read, even if (at this time) by a very small group.  It’s enough to sustain me and encourage me to, as one friend commands, “keep writing”!

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
  • A new gig and other things

    July 13th, 2008

    Last week I started a new job.  Well, more like a new old job.  I’ve taken a position as a survey coordinator with a former employer.  I have the distinct pleasure of working again with a group of people that I respect and like.  There are some new faces, of course, but overall it’s a great group and I’m happy to be back with them.  The downside is I haven’t written for my blog since starting my new job until now.  I have been writing, however.  Check out The Writer’s Resource Center and see all my long comments to John Hewitt‘s latest series on becoming a technical writer.  He’s using a new style that I think is working very well.  He ends his post with a few questions, and that’s what does me in.  Although I’m not a technical writer, John and I apparently have enough work experience in common that I can’t help but write essays in responding to his questions.  I hope he doesn’t get tired of hearing from me :-)

    John’s new series and my new job are leading to me rethink this blog.  I want to stay focused on writing, but I don’t want to just rehash what everyone else in the blogosphere is saying about writing.  My new old job is in the field of public health, and I think there’s a lot to say about that field.  In particular, how to write about public health:

    • how to write reports that may have a widely diverse audience (general public as well as public health professionals)
    • how to integrate public health statistics in a way meaningful to the lay person
    • when and how to use graphics, figures, and tables
    • how to decide on what public health topics to write about

    If you work in the public health field, or have an interest in public health, please leave a comment or email me directly with any suggestions you might have for my blog.

    And, as always, thanks for stopping by!

    Share this post:

    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
    • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
    • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
←Previous Page
1 … 114 115 116 117 118 … 122
Next Page→

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Marie at 1 Write Way
    • Join 2,356 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Marie at 1 Write Way
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d